[MWS]: EARTRAINING SURVEY
Hartmuth Kinzler
Hartmuth.Kinzler at rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE
Sam Nov 21 13:51:57 CET 1998
>Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 11:38:50 -0800 (PST)
>Reply-To: smt-list at boethius.music.ucsb.edu
>Originator: smt-list at boethius.music.ucsb.edu
>Sender: smt-list at boethius.music.ucsb.edu
>From: Douglas Spangler <spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu>
>To: hkinzler at rz.uni-osnabrueck.de
>Subject: EARTRAINING SURVEY
>
>Dear SMT List Subscribers,
>
>PURPOSE--to evaluate the use of CAI (Computer-Assisted Instruction) in
>undergraduate Ear-Training during the 1998-99 academic year as part of a
>Master's Thesis in Music Theory.
>
>More than 54 Colleges and Universities have responded to the following
>Eartraining CAI survey. Preliminary results as well as a list of the
>responding institutions can be viewed on my web page at
>http://www.msu.edu/user/spangle9
>
>PLEASE consider filling out this 2-MINUTE SURVEY if your institution is not
>yet represented.
>
>FORMAT--Most of the questions can be answered by tabbing the appropriate
>response or deleting the responses that do not apply.
>___________________________________________________
>PLEASE SEND RESPONSE TO: spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu
>
>1. Name of Undergraduate Institution:
>2. Approximate number of Undergraduate Music Majors:
> 1 to 19 students
> 20 to 49 students
> 50 to 99 students
> 100 to 199 students
> 200+
>3. Which CAI Programs are used (more than one may apply)?
> NONE--(PLEASE SEND RESPONSE TO: spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu)
> MacGamut
> Practica Musica
> OTHER (Please specify)
>4. How do students access CAI Software (more than one may apply)?
> In ONE computer lab
> From MANY computer labs
> Personal copies of CAI Software
> Through a campus NETWORK
> OTHER MEANS OF DISTRIBUTION (Please specify)
>5. How many computers in labs have access to CAI Software?
> NONE
> 1 to 9 computers
> 10 to 19 computers
> 20 to 29 computers
> 30+
>6. How is CAI integrated (more than one may apply)?
> PRACTICE ONLY--Individual Student Practice--NO TRACKING
> TIME--Tracking of time spent on CAI
> TESTING--Students pass levels or complete exercises
> LAB WORK--Students use CAI during part of a CLASS PERIOD
>7. How is CAI work evaluated?
> UNGRADED PRACTICE
> EXTRA CREDIT
> 1-9% of the GRADE
> 10% to 19% of the GRADE
> 20% to 29% of the GRADE
> 30% to 39% of the GRADE
> OTHER (Please specify)
>8. How would you rate the CAI software (OPTIONAL)?
> Excellent --Highly successful
> Good --Moderately successful
> Fair --Workable, slight flaws
> Poor --Unworkable, major flaws
>9. Do students seem to find the CAI helpful?
> Yes
> No
> Indifferent
>10. Please write any additional observations (OPTIONAL).
> (shortcomings, problems, successes)
>
>___________________________________________________
>PLEASE SEND RESPONSE TO: spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu
>
> Douglas R. Spangler spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu
>Master's Student in Music Theory: Michigan State University
> http://www.msu.edu/user/spangle9
>
>
>
>