[MWS]: EARTRAINING SURVEY

Hartmuth Kinzler Hartmuth.Kinzler at rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE
Sam Nov 21 13:51:57 CET 1998


>Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 11:38:50 -0800 (PST)
>Reply-To: smt-list at boethius.music.ucsb.edu
>Originator: smt-list at boethius.music.ucsb.edu
>Sender: smt-list at boethius.music.ucsb.edu
>From: Douglas Spangler <spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu>
>To: hkinzler at rz.uni-osnabrueck.de
>Subject: EARTRAINING SURVEY
>
>Dear SMT List Subscribers,
>
>PURPOSE--to evaluate the use of  CAI (Computer-Assisted Instruction) in
>undergraduate Ear-Training during the 1998-99 academic year as part of a
>Master's Thesis in Music Theory.
>
>More than 54 Colleges and Universities have responded to the following
>Eartraining CAI survey.  Preliminary results as well as a list of the
>responding institutions can be viewed on my web page at
>http://www.msu.edu/user/spangle9
>
>PLEASE consider filling out this 2-MINUTE SURVEY if your institution is not
>yet represented.
>
>FORMAT--Most of the questions can be answered by tabbing the appropriate
>response or deleting the responses that do not apply.
>___________________________________________________
>PLEASE SEND RESPONSE TO:  spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu
>
>1.   Name of Undergraduate Institution:
>2.   Approximate number of Undergraduate Music Majors:
>	1 to 19 students
>	20 to 49 students
>	50 to 99 students
>	100 to 199 students
>	200+
>3.   Which CAI Programs are used (more than one may apply)?
>	NONE--(PLEASE SEND RESPONSE TO:  spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu)
>	MacGamut
>	Practica Musica
>	OTHER (Please specify)
>4.    How do students access CAI Software (more than one may apply)?
>	In ONE computer lab
>	From MANY computer labs
>	Personal copies of CAI Software
>	Through a campus NETWORK
>	OTHER MEANS OF DISTRIBUTION (Please specify)
>5.    How many computers in labs have access to CAI Software?
>	NONE
>	1 to 9 computers
>	10 to 19 computers
>	20 to 29 computers
>	30+
>6.    How is CAI  integrated (more than one may apply)?
>	PRACTICE ONLY--Individual Student Practice--NO TRACKING
>	TIME--Tracking of time spent on CAI
>	TESTING--Students pass levels or complete exercises
>	LAB WORK--Students use CAI during part of a CLASS PERIOD
>7.   How is CAI work evaluated?
>	UNGRADED PRACTICE
>	EXTRA CREDIT
>	1-9% of the GRADE
>	10% to 19% of the GRADE
>	20% to 29% of the GRADE
>	30% to 39% of the GRADE
>	OTHER (Please specify)
>8.   How would you rate the CAI software (OPTIONAL)?
>	Excellent	--Highly successful
>	Good	--Moderately successful
>	Fair	--Workable, slight flaws
>	Poor	--Unworkable, major flaws
>9.   Do students seem to find the CAI helpful?
>	Yes
>	No
>	Indifferent
>10.  Please write any additional observations (OPTIONAL).
>	(shortcomings, problems, successes)
>
>___________________________________________________
>PLEASE SEND RESPONSE TO:  spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu
>
>          Douglas R. Spangler     spangle9 at pilot.msu.edu
>Master's Student in Music Theory: Michigan State University
>	http://www.msu.edu/user/spangle9
>
>
>
>